Palantir (PLTR) Technical Analysis Today: Burry's Bearish Bet
Palantir Under Pressure in 2026
Palantir Technologies (PLTR) has lost 28% of its value in 2026, and the latest 13F filings reveal that Michael Burry has doubled down on his bearish bet, holding long-dated put options with strikes at $100 and $50. Burry's thesis centers on Palantir being 'wildly overvalued' even after the drawdown.
Whether you agree with Burry or see this as a buying opportunity, the chart pattern data provides an objective lens. Chart Library's similarity search finds every historical moment when PLTR's chart looked like today and tracks what happened next.
PLTR After 25%+ Drawdowns
Palantir has experienced drawdowns of 25% or more from a recent high approximately 8 times since going public in 2020. The forward return profile from these points is mixed. The 5-day return has averaged roughly +1.4% with a 56% win rate. The 10-day return has averaged approximately +2.8% with a 52% win rate.
What stands out is the bimodal distribution of outcomes. PLTR either bounces sharply (+10% or more over 10 days) or continues sliding. There is relatively little middle ground. This is characteristic of high-beta momentum stocks — when sentiment shifts, it shifts hard in either direction.
- 5-day return after 25%+ drawdown: ~56% win rate, ~+1.4% avg
- 10-day return: ~52% win rate, ~+2.8% avg
- Bimodal outcome distribution — sharp bounce or continued decline
- High-beta behavior amplifies both upside and downside moves
Celebrity Short Sellers and Pattern Data
Historical data on stocks targeted by prominent short sellers reveals an interesting pattern. In the 30 days following a publicized short thesis, the stock tends to experience continued pressure as followers pile on. But in the 60-90 day window, the performance normalizes — the short thesis is either validated by fundamentals or squeezed out by buyers who disagree.
For Palantir specifically, the pattern data suggests the current chart shape most closely resembles episodes in late 2022 and mid-2023 where the stock consolidated for several weeks before making a directional move. The direction of that move depended on whether the AI/government contract pipeline delivered.
What to Watch
The key variable for PLTR's near-term direction is whether the current decline stabilizes into a consolidation range or breaks to new lows. Historical analogs that stabilized within 5% of the current level resolved bullishly in roughly 60% of cases. Analogs that continued lower before stabilizing had worse 30-day outcomes.
Monitor PLTR's relative strength vs. the software sector. If PLTR starts outperforming the sector during a broader tech selloff, it signals that the stock-specific selling is exhausting — a necessary precondition for a durable bottom.
Search PLTR on chartlibrary.io to see Palantir's closest historical pattern matches and forward return statistics.
Ready to try Chart Library?
Anchor any ticker + date — see what history says about your setup, with cohort statistics, feature attribution, and AI narrative.
Try it freeLearn the methodology
Chart Library is built on four canonical concepts. Read the pillars to understand what backs the numbers in this post:
Related Articles
Technical Analysis vs. Historical Base Rates: Two Questions Your Trading Agent Keeps Confusing
Your technical-analysis agent reads what the chart looks like now (RSI, MACD, support/resistance). A historical-base-rate node tells you what charts that looked like this one did next. They're different questions — and a good agent crew routes between them instead of collapsing them.
PLTR Pre-Earnings Drift: Setup Heading Into Monday's Print
Palantir reports Q1 2026 earnings Monday after close. We pulled the historical pre-earnings drift pattern for PLTR — what the stock tends to do in the 5 trading days before earnings, and the win rate of long-the-drift since the AI capex cycle began.
PLTR Earnings-Day Base Rates: The Last 12 Quarters
Palantir's earnings-day reactions over the last 12 quarters: how often the stock has held the reaction 1, 5, and 10 sessions later, and which features predicted the difference between a fade and a follow-through.