Start here / Two minutes
See the matches, inspect the differences, and understand what the evidence can tell us.
/ CB-001
We matched IONQ's final ten bars to 50 historical moments, then inspected the preceding hour. Elapsed time, missing bars, and the earlier move changed the comparison.
Comparisons inspected; outcomes not tested
Read the article and its evidence
/ CB-003
Both charts decline late, but IONQ enters that interval below its hour-start price while PENN enters above it. A follow-up using the original 50 comparisons.
Follow-up on the original sample; outcomes not tested
Read the article and its evidence
/ CB-004
HYFM and KOD use ten stored observations across 13 and 22 minutes. Missing clock-window returns remain unknown. A follow-up to the original IONQ case.
Follow-up on the original sample; outcomes not tested
Read the article and its evidenceA case can introduce a setup, examine a misleading lookalike, investigate the event behind a move, or report a completed test. Each entry states what was observed and what remains untested.
Similarity gives us examples to investigate. Claims about an edge require a separate test with rules fixed before the confirmation data are inspected.
Browse the research studies, search the memory yourself, or connect an AI agent.
Follow the research
An email when we publish a new Chart Casebook article, with the charts, observations, and evidence.